Compound

Valuation Ratios: P/E, PEG, Price-to-Book, and EV/EBITDA

Every valuation ratio is the same sentence with different nouns: price, divided by something the business produces. None of them tells you whether a stock is cheap — they tell you what the market is currently assuming, which is a far more useful thing to know.

Last verified 2026-07-28

P/E is an expectation, not a verdict

Price-to-earnings is the share price divided by earnings per share. A P/E of 20 says the market is paying $20 for each $1 of current annual earnings — or, read the other way, that it would take 20 years of today's earnings to repay the price.

The instinct is to call a low P/E cheap. That instinct is wrong often enough to be dangerous, because the ratio's denominator is today's earnings and the price reflects tomorrow's. A P/E of 6 usually means the market expects earnings to fall, not that it has overlooked a bargain.

So the ratio isn't a valuation — it's a summary of what's being assumed. The work is deciding whether the assumption is right, and that requires comparison: against the company's competitors, against its own history, and against the growth rate the price implies.

The reframe

A low P/E is not a discount. It's a forecast of decline that you can agree or disagree with.

PEG, and how much weight it can carry

PEG divides the P/E by the expected earnings growth rate, addressing the obvious objection to P/E: a fast-growing company should be worth more per dollar of current earnings, because current earnings understate it.

A P/E of 30 growing at 30% gives a PEG of 1.0; a P/E of 15 growing at 5% gives 3.0. On this measure the expensive-looking company is the cheaper one, which is a genuinely useful correction to the raw ratio.

Hold the rule loosely, though. PEG comes from Peter Lynch's writing rather than any regulator or research finding. It breaks entirely for low-growth and shrinking companies — a negative growth rate makes it meaningless. And it is only as good as the growth estimate you feed it, which is usually an analyst forecast, not a fact.

Enterprise value counts what you'd actually take on

Market cap prices the equity. Enterprise value prices the whole business: market cap plus total debt minus cash. Debt is added because an acquirer inherits it; cash is subtracted because an acquirer keeps it and can use it to offset the purchase.

That's why EV/EBITDA can rank two companies differently from P/E. P/E sees only the equity slice and is distorted by how a company is financed — a heavily indebted firm can show a flattering P/E while being expensive to actually own.

EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation — pairs with EV because it's also pre-financing, so both sides of the ratio ignore capital structure. Its weakness is that it ignores real costs: depreciation stands in for equipment that genuinely wears out and must be replaced, so EBITDA flatters capital-intensive businesses most.

The takeaway

P/E is price per dollar of earnings, PEG adjusts it for growth, EV/EBITDA counts the debt an acquirer would inherit. A ratio is only meaningful against a comparison — the same company, its competitors, or its own history.

Sources

Practice this lesson in the app

This page is the reading. Open the lesson in Compound for the practice questions. You'll need an account. Lessons unlock one at a time, so this one opens when you reach it.

Open this lesson